XR Physics
Lecture 2
Source to image distance
Large SID used in fixed CXR because it reduces magnification
Closer source is to the target (patient) = the more the structures will be magnified
Same thing as PA vs AP
So if you have two masses, one in anterior chest and one in posterior chest they will look different sizes
Contrast
Contrast is basically how different are the gray levels
Better contrast is achieved by
Lowering kV
Lowering FOV
Post image processing
Noise = Quantum Mottle
Basically differences in gray color for same material
Decrease noise = better image = achieved by
Increase mAs = more radiation to detector
Increase kV = more radiation to detector
Post image processing
Spatial resolution
How much blur is there, ability to see small objects
Improve (increase) spatial resolution via
Decreasing focal spot size
Decrease pixel size (decreased detector element size)
Magnification has varying effect
Detector Pitch
Detector element size
This is a small detector that says how much radiation is hitting it and gives you an average
If you have one then will average all the radiation hitting it = no bueno
More detectors = can see smaller shit = better spatial resolution
Magnification
Increasing focal spot = more blur
Decreases detector blur but increases focal spot blur
Seems important - maybe look into this more
Contrast to noise ration
If you decrease FOV = less scatter = better contrast (noise unaffected) = better C/N ration
Focal spot only affects blur
Decrease tube current = more noise = worse C/N
dN = 1/sqrt of dose = Need to know this
As dose to receptor goes up = noise goes down
dN = change in noise
If you have the mAs the noise willi ncrease 40%
Leakage - small amount of radiation that escapes machine and doses the non-patient
Primary beam - what gives the dose to the patient
Scatter - any time the beam hits anything it will get redirected and go other places
Includes hitting the patient which is usually the largest source of scatter
Exposure index
Amount of radiation hitting the detector
Typical doses
150-300 for body XR (KUB)
700-1000 = Extremity = want less noise and also more radiation hitting detector because there is less soft tissue and shit
CXR
125 Kv (high)
1 mAs (low)
5 ms of time
mostly air so
AEC used
Grid used
Exposure index = 3 uGy
entrance air kerma (Kair) = 0.1 mGy
Portable CXR
80 kV
Lower Kv (Kv is the same as tube voltage) because has less scatter, do this because cannot use a grid, cannot use grid because it is bedside and pt cannot be exactly positioned correctly perpendicular and would result in artifact
1 mAs
No grid
No AEC (it is manual)
Adult KUB
80 kV
Low Kv = gives better contrast and the abdominal shit is all gray anyway so need better contrast (if fat need more)
If go lower than this the beam will not penetrate the abdomen
20 mAs
AEC used
Grid used
Extremity XR
Small focal spot = increased spatial resolution = Kv & ma are lower so can get away with it and not have too much heat
55 kV
<1 mAs
AEC optional -
Grid optional
Peds CXR
lower kV = 60 kV
Better contrast and lower radiation
lower mAs = 1
Basically same as an extremity
Exposure index is the same = still need same amount of radiation hitting detector - the dose to patient is different _because they are different size and therefore less absorbed in smaller people (i think?) but dose to the receptor is the same because need to keep same noise and shit the same
Artifacts
Lag/Ghosting
After your take a pic, the electrons stay in detector and are not cleared out, then stuff from the old image persists on the next picture taken
Usually with high Z materials (prosthesis)
Fix via put acrylic and take blank pic if needed, this usually resolves on its own
Dust on laser (CR)/Dead pixel row (DR)
Row of detector elements that stop working
Looks like a straight line for no reason
Poor calibration
AEC is seen basically
Normally the AEC is not seen because there is calibration or some shit to make them invisible
Needs to be recalibrated to fix - called flat field correction
Grid Cutoff
Need detector to be perpendicular to the grid
If it is not then a lot of the good radiation that we need to make the image is blocked by the grid
Correct by making beam perpendicular to grid
Can lines and if radiation does not hit detector or is blocked by detector by the grid will be white (as if it were bone)
Gridlines
Multiple horizontal lines - looks like beat bord
Should not see normally because one of the follow
Grid is shaken so cannot see
Some other shit
If you see gridlines —> it stopped shaking or post image processing failed
Correct via removing grid (or fix the reason it failed, motor to shake not working)
Electromagnetic interference
Only on digital detectors
looks like bunch of lines similar to gridlines
Usually because there is a device that interferes with the XR machine by giving out electromagnetic radiation and interefers with sending shit to the computer (such as pain pump or some shit)
Effective dose
CXR = 0.02 mSv = should know this number
KUB = 0.7 mSv
d
Lecture 3 - Mammo/Tomo
Filter used to get rid of high and low energy photons
Higher energy photons will decrease your contrast
Grid is used
At high kV it is hard to differentiate between different substances because attenuation doesnt change much
At lower energy it is easier to differentiate different tissue densities (better contrast) because their attenuation differences are exaggerated (more different, more contrast)
20-30 kV (tube voltage) is about where you want to be
Gives us a beam energy after filtration of about 20 keV
Tube current 100 mA - typically fixed
because we use small focal spot (to keep blur low), it is easy to overhead system with the small focal spot, so we use exposure time to control amount of radiation and keep the mA fixed so as not to overheat
Typical exposure time = 500 ms
1 cm HVL (?)
less tissue needed to block half the beam because we are using lower energy beams
Focal spot size of 0.3 (screeners) to 0.1 mm (magnification views) (smaller than radiography)
Need high spatial resolution (means low blur)
Need this to see the micro-calcs
The spatial resolution in mammo is 2x that as regular radiography (radiography has more blur)
AEC
Does more than in radiography
Will choose target material, filter material, kV and filter time
Takes in a bunch of factors like distance and shit to determine other stuff
Heel effect
Cathode side (side where more radiation comes out) is closer to body because that part of breast is thicker than where the nipple is
Cathode/anode will also be tilted toward nipple slightly
Prevents all this radiation hitting the chest wall which does nothing and allows you to see breast better
Target material - curved line shit
Material that radiation hits to create XR
Remember 20 keV is target for what we want
One way = Mo or Rh
Mo = thinner breasts
Blocks low energy photons and high energy photons
Lets middle energy photons pass through it
It does this because of its k-edge
Mo target Mo filter for thin breasts
Mo target + Rh filter for medium breasts
Never use Rh target with Mo filter (i think this is what he said)
Rh = thicker breasts
Need little bit more higher energy photons to get through the breast
blocks low energy photons and very high energy photons but allows some higher energy photons through that Mo would have blocked
Will have slightly lower contrast because of this
Rh target, rh filter for very thick breasts
Other way = W (tungsten)
Doesn’t matter breast size
Uses silver or Rh for
Silver is for thicker breasts (>6 cm)
Port window is made of beryllium (low Z)
if you used glass too much of the radiation would get blocker
Compression
Decreases focal spot blur
Tissue is closer to detector
Decreases scatter
Less room for scatter to occur
Decreases dose
Less overlapping of breast tissue on itself
MQSA maximum initially = 25-45 lbs
Detectors
Csl (indirect)
a-Sel (direct)
Offers best characterization of microcalcifications
Best spatial resolution
Does not create intermate light which causes shit to get fucked up
MQSA requires a line to be present on the detector
Allows you to know where the detector is and therefore where to put the breast over it
Image processing
DICOM Gray scale display function
Basically the image should look the same from one monitor to another, should not be a change
Includes luminance, how much light needs to be put out so that you can see a difference in the shade of gray
Display
Needs to be certified for mammo
5 mp (mega pixel) (5 million pixels)
Brightest white that the monitor can give off cannot be below 420 cd/m2 = 420 is lit = need to know this number
Typical pixel size = 70 um
Benign calc is about 150 um so you ideally want more than one pixel per calc
d
Lecture 4 Tomo/Mammo pt 2
MQSA mag must be 1.4-2x (same as regular mammo)
Mag views in mammo
A smaller focal spot must be used
less photons can be used otherwise will get too hot
so need to use lower mA
we counteract this by having 3x exposure time to get enough radiation for the image
Exposure time is longer in mag vs regular contact mammo
No grid in mag mammo
Would increase scatter but we have air gap effect which counteracts this
Air gap effect - by leaving a space between the breast and detector there is a normal loss of scatter because the particles that move super lateral hit nothing and dose is also lower because of this
Tomosynthesis
kV 25-40
~1mm slices
Takes 4-25 s to acquire
Phantom
4.2 cm compressed
Represent 50/50 glanularity
3 objects inside
Fibers = architectural distortion = 1.5 mm (0.75 mm is needed to pass test)
Calcifications (speck groups) = o.3 mm (0.2-0.3 mm is needed to pass test)
Masses = 0.75 mm
Phantom is tested weekly
To pass MQSA you need to be able to see 4 fibers, 3 speck groups, 3 masses, for acr it is 2-3-2
Thinner the breast = better contrast (assuming same glandularity)
MQSA stuff
Need to keep last study for 10 years
Need to keep other studies that are not the last one for 5 years
Idea is that you have at least 5 prior studies to compare to
Patient dose
Mean glandular dose
Absorbed dose to the glandular tissue
Estimated, not exact
Must be <3 mgy
This is not the dose to the pt
Typical dose is 1.5 (half the max)
Effective dose
0.4 mSv is typical
Screening tomo
Between 500 mb and 3gb of data
Artifacts
Slinky artifact
Staircase/terrace artifact
Halo artifact
Lecture 6 Knobology Dose Artifacts
KAP = average absorbed dose X area
Basically same as DAP
Increased DAP —> Increased effective dose
Pulse width
So you are hitting patient with beam
Pulse width is basically how long you leave the beam on
Left on longer = more time for motion to occur = worse temporal resolution
Called continuous mode
Shorter pulse width = less time = sharper image
Needs more radiation = more heating vs
Called pulsed mode
Increasing mA or pulse width may compensate for shitty images at lower pps (7.5 pps vs 30 for example)
Electronic magnification (mag on the fluro machine)
Increases spatial resolution
Increases Kair and decreases area so the KAP stays about the same
The skin is getting a higher dose though
AEC (automatic brightness control)
Keeps image bright
Changes kV and mA
Can increase mA = higher dose and better contrast OR
Can increase kV = lower dose and worse contrast
Collimation
No change in spatial resolution
Decreases pt dose, beam strength the same but less hitting pt, skin dose stays about the same
Note in mag the dose in beam goes up but target area decreases so stays about the same
Maximum entrance air kerma 88mGy/min or 10 roentingen/min
High level control (Boost)
Idk something for fat pts to get around the max kerma shit
Effective dose - basically how bad to cause cancer
Pin cushion distortion - only on II systems
Basically image looks like its pulled in centrally
Vignetting - II only
Reason why central area is white and periphery is little darker
Something to do with curve in the machine
Signal saturation - shit is so bright like seen on the fluoro spine nonsense dictation ones
S wave artifact
makes center of image look very slightly wavy
something with magnetic field messing it up (ie if MRI machine is close to scanner)
Parallax artifact
what happens when doing LP when machine is not directly over the needle and looks like its angled basically
beam diverges
Worse in fluoro because there is a shorter source to image ratio
most fluor is a few mSV (modifieds are less tho)
f
f
f
Sources: